ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACTS OF INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENTS ON WATER QAULITY IN MUDI RIVER
Thoko Fostino
2022
Dr. Isaac Tchuwa
This study assessed the effectiveness of beneficiary registration in food distribution during the 2024/2025 El Niño-induced drought response in Traditional Authority (T/A) Tsabango, Lilongwe District, Malawi. The study examined how registration processes influenced transparency, accountability, and fairness in humanitarian food distribution programs. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative and qualitative research designs. Data were collected through household questionnaires, key …
… (198 more words)The study was conducted in Traditional Authority (T/A) Tsabango in Lilongwe District, central Malawi. The area is mainly rural with some semi-urban settlements, and most households depend on subsistence farming. Livelihoods are largely based on rain-fed agriculture, making the area highly vulnerable to droughts and erratic rainfall. The main crops grown include maize, groundnuts, and legumes, and poor rainfall during the 2024/2025 El Niño drought led to reduced yields, food shortages, and increased food insecurity. During the drought response, humanitarian food assistance was coordinated by DoDMA in collaboration with the Lilongwe District Council and partners such as WFP and the Malawi Red Cross Society. Beneficiary registration played a key role in determining which households received assistance. T/A Tsabango was selected as the study area due to its high vulnerability to drought and reports of challenges in beneficiary registration, including exclusion of eligible households, favoritism, and limited transparency, making it suitable for assessing the effectiveness of the registration system.
This study assessed the effectiveness of beneficiary registration in food distribution during the 2024/2025 El Niño-induced drought response in Traditional Authority (T/A) Tsabango, Lilongwe District, Malawi. The study examined how registration processes influenced transparency, accountability, and fairness in humanitarian food distribution programs. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative and qualitative research designs. Data were collected through household questionnaires, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and document reviews involving beneficiary households, local leaders, and humanitarian actors. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The findings revealed that the beneficiary registration process was moderately effective but faced significant challenges in transparency, accountability, and operational efficiency. Although community-based approaches enhanced local participation, the registration process was largely dominated by village leaders with limited technical oversight. Many respondents reported that beneficiary lists were not openly shared and that selection criteria were unclear, contributing to perceptions of favoritism and targeting errors. The study further found that accountability mechanisms, including complaint-handling systems, were weak, as many grievances were not adequately addressed. Operational challenges such as long distances to registration centers, inadequate staffing, congestion, and limited information dissemination also constrained equitable access to registration services. The study concludes that weaknesses in transparency, accountability, and operational systems undermined the fairness and credibility of beneficiary registration and food distribution during the drought response. The study recommends strengthening oversight mechanisms, improving communication and information sharing, decentralizing registration centers, increasing staffing levels, and enhancing grievance redress systems to promote more transparent, inclusive, and accountable humanitarian food distribution programs in Malawi.
This study assessed the effectiveness of beneficiary registration in food distribution during the 2024/2025 El Niño-induced drought response in Traditional Authority (T/A) Tsabango, Lilongwe District, Malawi. Many respondents reported that beneficiary lists were not openly shared and that selection criteria were unclear, contributing to perceptions of favoritism and targeting errors. The study concludes that weaknesses in transparency, accountability, and operational systems undermined the fairness and credibility of beneficiary registration and food distribution during the drought response. The study recommends strengthening oversight mechanisms, improving communication and information sharing, decentralizing registration centers, increasing staffing levels, and enhancing grievance redress systems to promote more transparent, inclusive, and accountable humanitarian food distribution programs in Malawi.
The study was conducted in Traditional Authority (T/A) Tsabango in Lilongwe District, central Malawi. The area is mainly rural with some semi-urban settlements, and most households depend on subsistence farming. Livelihoods are largely based on rain-fed agriculture, making the area highly vulnerable to droughts and erratic rainfall. The main crops grown include maize, groundnuts, and legumes, and poor rainfall during the 2024/2025 El Niño drought led to reduced yields, food shortages, and increased food insecurity. During the drought response, humanitarian food assistance was coordinated by DoDMA in collaboration with the Lilongwe District Council and partners such as WFP and the Malawi Red Cross Society. Beneficiary registration played a key role in determining which households received assistance. T/A Tsabango was selected as the study area due to its high vulnerability to drought and reports of challenges in beneficiary registration, including exclusion of eligible households, favoritism, and limited transparency, making it suitable for assessing the effectiveness of the registration system.
Traditional authority: Sctsabango
District: Lilongwe
Coordinates: -13.99275, 33.8818
APA 7th edition format: